🔗 Share this article Relatives' Heartache Over Coastal Degradation Threatening Norfolk Graves Families of people buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion say that indecision on how best to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones. A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations. A recent report on the issue details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed. “Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.” Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said. Haunted by the Past A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard. “It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.” “I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.” A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy Along the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated. “It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.” In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.” Searching for Solutions and Certainty The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried. Some want additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Others argue the time for relocation is approaching. “It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.” A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.” It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.” “There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the right solutions for each community.” The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.